What is the Cyber Trust Mark Program and How Will It Enhance Digital Identity Verification For IoT?

August 29, 2023
“Smart devices make our lives easier and more efficient… But increased interconnection also brings increased security and privacy risks. Today I am proposing that the FCC establish a new cybersecurity labeling program so that consumers will know when devices meet widely accepted security standards…” - Jessica Rosenworcel, Chairman of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 

When was the last time you were without your smartphone? Chances are you have some type of smart device interacting with you at almost all times. Homes, cars, healthcare, and even family dynamics are now seemingly device-driven and while that has added incredible levels of convenience to all aspects of life, it’s also opened up new types of unforeseen security issues. The Internet of Things (IoT) is changing how we live our digital lives, and that means we need better protection of our digital identities. 

To address these challenges, President Biden recently announced the U.S. Cyber Trust Mark program, an effort by the FCC to underscore the importance of digital identity security in the context of IoT. The initiative is a positive first step towards enhancing digital identity security for the growing number of people who rely on devices to operate their business and personal lives. The number of IoT devices in use is expected to be more than 14 billion by 2025, and with that level of activity, the security and privacy of users must be prioritized. 

The program will use a branded, recognizable symbol to signify a product or service's adherence to stringent cybersecurity standards, and will foster a safer online environment for individuals, businesses, and organizations. This innovative certification approach aims to address the rapidly growing issues around identity theft and related cyberattacks by ensuring consumers that their identity, data, and privacy are effectively safeguarded.

Why is Digital Identity Verification Important For IoT?

This massive – and growing – array of devices all require some form of digital authentication to be able to operate according to accepted standards. Their everyday actions should be predictable and expected, limited to authorized tasks, and any deviation from the norm should activate prompt and thorough scrutiny.

When it comes to digital identity, the treatment of a device’s identity parallels that of a person. As we venture into the realm of digital asset brokerage (where entities like cars pay for parking or machines order spare parts independently), these microtransactions must adhere to the same rigorous authentication and authorization protocols as if two humans were engaging in the transaction. Fundamental questions such as “Who are you?”, and “Am I transacting with the correct entity?”, as well as “Is this a legitimate transaction?”, and “Is this behavior within the norm?”. These things must all be addressed, implemented, and managed in a manner that aligns with conventional digital transactions. 

This is why the Cyber Trust Mark program will be a welcome addition to IoT innovation. Within IoT activity, digital identity verification is crucial because it aims to ensure the security of interconnected devices, preventing potential cyberattacks and eliminating fraudsters from unauthorized access. This is especially important as attacks and fraud types are becoming more varied and sophisticated. 

Digital identity verification also maintains data integrity and ensures that data exchanged between devices remains accurate and untampered. With proper identity verification, access control mechanisms can be established, allowing only authorized users and their devices to interact within the IoT ecosystem. This safeguards user privacy, as sensitive information is protected, and data sharing is controlled with user consent. Digital identity verification also promotes trustworthiness, allowing manufacturers to demonstrate adherence to security standards like the Cyber Trust Mark. 

Digital identities now exist in numerous forms, from individual accounts and transactions to credentials representing people, resources, assets, machines, and systems. These identities are not limited to humans, as they extend to computer systems, applications, networks, and of course, IoT devices.

The significance of digital identity lies in its role in securing data and devices while ensuring privacy compliance. Establishing trust in connected devices and between users and services is essential. By verifying trust and encrypting transactions, secure communication and transmission of encrypted data become possible. The more that can happen, the larger the IoT footprint can grow.

The Risk of Poor IoT Identity Verification

The significance of digital identity verification for IoT lies in safeguarding against fraud, thwarting potential hacking attempts, and ultimately curbing the transformation of IoT networks into a fertile ground for malicious actors to exploit individuals and organizations. Lack of the proper verification techniques and approaches results in substantial financial losses or even the paralysis of critical infrastructures.

Failing to secure data and devices and neglecting the establishment of high-assurance identities can lead to a variety of bad and unintended consequences. The importance of maintaining confidence, certainty, and protection through robust digital identity practices is critical for all organizations as they seek to grow their footprint with the development and marketing of IoT devices.

​​When digital identity verification is not executed correctly in the usage of IoT devices, unauthorized access may be granted, allowing malicious actors to exploit device functionalities or gain entry to sensitive data. This can lead to privacy breaches, as personal and confidential information stored or transmitted by these devices could be compromised.

Customer experience and fraud leaders know that digital identity verification can also result in device spoofing or impersonation. In such cases, attackers can manipulate or replicate device identities, misleading users and potentially causing them to interact with malicious devices unknowingly.

The lack of proper identity management hinders effective access control, enabling unauthorized parties to potentially control or manipulate IoT devices. This could result in disruptions to device operations, unauthorized actions, or even the compromise of larger systems in which these devices are integrated. Additionally, compromised digital identities might lead to things like unauthorized software updates or alterations to device configurations. This can introduce vulnerabilities or instability into the devices' functions, jeopardizing their intended operations.

As noted earlier, identity-related cyber attacks are becoming increasingly creative. When digital identity verification is not adequately managed, the potential for large-scale attacks involving IoT botnets increases. Attackers can harness compromised devices to launch Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, overwhelming networks and online services, thereby causing widespread disruption.

The framework for digital activity demands rigorous verification of users, but that cannot happen alone. Digital identity verification is crucial for maintaining the security, privacy, and proper functioning of IoT devices, but to function properly, it requires a collaborative relationship among vendors who want to establish their adherence to identity verification best practices.

Cyber Trust Mark Strengthens Identity Verification for Connected Devices

The Cyber Trust Mark initiative proposes to address a variety of aspects of IoT security, including password management, protection of stored and transmitted data, and guidance on verifying and validating users. 

The voluntary program will create something like a device-specific Better Business Bureau that signifies a product or service's adherence to NIST-validated criteria for cybersecurity best practices. Its goal is to instill a sense of confidence among consumers and users, as they will be able to easily identify products and services that have undergone rigorous cybersecurity assessments. This, in turn, encourages the adoption of secure technologies and platforms while discouraging the use of less secure alternatives. This unified standard could effectively reduce the fragmentation and confusion that currently surround various cybersecurity certifications, enabling individuals to make informed choices about the digital products they use.

Ultimately, the Cyber Trust Mark should be able to incentivize businesses and technology providers to invest in robust cybersecurity measures. The prospect of displaying this mark could drive organizations to prioritize security in their development processes, leading to the creation of more resilient and fortified digital systems. As companies strive to attain this recognized emblem of trust, they are likely to implement advanced security protocols and engage in ongoing assessments to maintain their compliance with the required standards.

By establishing a consistent benchmark for cybersecurity, the Cyber Trust Mark can promote interoperability among different digital systems and services. This should create greater harmony among security practices across industries, contributing to a more cohesive and secure digital ecosystem. As a result, users' data and sensitive information are less likely to be compromised due to vulnerabilities arising from disparate security implementations.

Ultimately, the FCC’s Cyber Trust Mark initiative has the potential to enhance digital identity security by fostering a culture of accountability, incentivizing robust cybersecurity practices, and providing individuals with clear indicators of trustworthiness in the products and services they use. Through this initiative, the government aims to facilitate a safer and more secure online landscape, benefiting both individuals and businesses alike.

How the Cyber Trust Mark Initiative Adapts to Digital Identity Verification

Establishing and managing unique digital identities for IoT devices presents numerous challenges stemming from the diverse array of devices, their varied manufacturers, and communication protocols. An ongoing issue in creating identity verification and security standards has been the scale and heterogeneity of IoT devices; implementing a standardized identity framework capable of accommodating their differences has not, until Cyber Trust Mark, been addressed in a sustainable way. 

IoT devices often have different lifecycles, adding complexity to identity management throughout provisioning, updates, and decommissioning. Interoperability presents a related, but additional challenge, as IoT devices need to seamlessly interact with each other and multiple platforms. The limited resources of many IoT devices, including processing power and memory, further complicate the implementation of secure identity mechanisms. Then, of course, vendors must address issues of compliance with varying regional and industry-specific regulations, which adds an additional layer of complexity to establishing digital identities.

The Cyber Trust Mark initiative entails a certification or labeling system that denotes a certain level of cybersecurity and trustworthiness for products or services, in this case, IoT devices. It will create requirements around specific cybersecurity and privacy criteria that IoT devices and service providers must meet to earn the trust mark. Independent third-party verification could be employed to assess whether devices meet the established criteria. 

These standards will radically improve the trust that needs to be established between IoT users and vendors. Additionally, raising public awareness about the trust mark's significance will undoubtedly help consumers make informed decisions when purchasing IoT devices, while incentives for manufacturers adhering to trust mark criteria could encourage improved security practices on a broader scale. 

Building Trust and Confidence Among IoT Consumers

The FCC's Cyber Security Mark aims to establish a clear and standardized benchmark for evaluating the cybersecurity measures of IoT devices, including digital identity verification. It also aims to cultivate an environment of security and privacy, which will calm concerns about personal data protection when engaging with certified IoT devices. Establishing this type of trust holds the potential to establish excellent digital customer experiences, and, ultimately, greater customer loyalty.

But this initiative goes beyond just emblematic assurances. It will bridge the gap between consumers' apprehensions over data breaches and their attraction to the convenience and efficiency that IoT devices offer. As the mark adorns an increasing array of devices, consumers' comfort with IoT technologies will naturally expand. This newfound comfort will encourage even more widespread adoption of smart home ecosystems, wearables, and a diverse spectrum of IoT applications, reshaping how consumers interact with and integrate these innovations into their lives.

The  Cyber Trust Mark's impact lies in its potential to elevate the security, privacy, and reliability of IoT devices through robust digital identity verification. By establishing a clear and credible marker of trust, the trust mark could reshape industry practices, enhance consumer protection, and contribute to a more secure and resilient IoT ecosystem.

The hope among customer experience and identity verification leaders is that it will become an important and indispensable seal of approval that consumers will use when selecting IoT devices. This initiative holds the power to redefine the IoT market, where the development of secure and reliable products takes precedence in a way that exceeds consumer expectations.


Keep reading

See all blogs
2024 Mobile Fraud Market Trends in the UK and Europe

The UK and Europe are experiencing a massive increase in mobile fraud. Consumers, businesses, and government agencies are alarmed and pondering their next steps as they prepare to deal with several emerging trends that have surfaced in 2024.

Charlie Rowland
June 18, 2024
Prove’s Brad Rosenfeld Explains the New Customer Onboarding Process on Fast Company

No longer confined to top-of-funnel engagement and brand awareness, CMOs are now leading efforts to shape the entire customer experience journey.

Kaushal Ls
June 6, 2024
PYMNTS TV: Prove CEO Rodger Desai Explains Need for Phone-Based Approach to Authentication

Prove’s CEO Rodger Desai was featured recently on PYMNTS TV, where he met with PYMNTS CEO Karen Webster to discuss trends and shifts in the identity verification market.

Kaushal Ls
June 4, 2024