In 2019, there’s no real need to explain the idea of a ‘virtual bank’ – put simply, it’s defined as a bank that delivers financial services primarily through the internet or other digital channels instead of physical branches. While it’s easier to understand the consumer side of it, but why do we need virtual or digital-only banks? What under-served or unserved customer segments or use cases are we targeting? Is there a solid business proposition here to set up such a bank or just sizzle? To know the answers to these questions, listen to an interesting chat we are bringing to you as a part of this article, in the SoundCloud link below, after a few paras.
Why are we focusing on Singapore in this article? On June 28, 2019, as many of you might already know, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) announced that it would issue up to five new digital-only bank licenses. The move extends the eligibility for digital bank licenses to non-bank players as well. The five new licenses will comprise:
This move is a step towards establishing standalone digital banks, giving non-banks and tech players an opportunity. In 2000, MAS allowed existing banks to have digital subsidiaries called Internet-Only Banks (IOBs).
In light of this move by MAS, the entire TechFin and FinTech market is in motion and are considering this opportunity very seriously. So, what will it be like in Singapore, with the new licenses? To better understand the current scenario, here’s an interesting voice chat featuring Amit Goel, Founder of MEDICI, in conversation with Southeast Asia FinTech expert Varun Mittal.
LISTEN HERE: Amit Goel discusses digital-only bank licenses in Singapore with Varun Mittal, an expert on FinTech in SE Asia
Before we dive deeper into the digital-only banking licenses that will be issued by MAS, a quick background on the current banking licenses that exist, just to set the context.
Against this background of existing financial services in Singapore, one anticipates that the new licensees will try to carve their own segment. However, that’s not all – we also expect the older players to leverage the opportunities presented by the new license initiatives. They will look to serve the potentially under-served segments and be prioritized by MAS for increasing financial inclusion.
One sees this clear prioritization in the announcement by MAS, “The entry of new digital players will add diversity and strengthen Singapore’s banking system in the digital economy of the future. With innovative business models and strong digital capabilities, these players can cater to under-served segments of the market.”
Although MAS has not yet specified the segments they deem under-served, it can draw out potential segments. In the near future, one expects that the following customer segments could be targeted:
If you were wondering what the need is for five different licenses for digital-only banks in Singapore, here’s the reasoning behind MAS’s decision. Of course, not every digital bank is the same; there will be differences in their target audience, offerings, and business models. A market is sustainable if there are diversity and variety in their propositions.
One expects the upcoming licensed digital-only banks to capture their customers and use the available data differently. But before we can evaluate the quality and characteristics of Singapore’s digital banking market, let's look at applicants’ eligibility.
The application for digital full bank licenses, of which a maximum of two will be available, is open to companies headquartered in Singapore and controlled by Singaporeans. Foreign companies are eligible for these full bank licenses if they form a joint venture with a Singapore company, meeting the headquarters and control requirements. In contrast to before, this would mean that IOBs, which were subsidiaries of the four local banks or nine QFBs, are expected to face stiff competition. This points to a significant expansion of digital banking.
Furthermore, digital full bank licenses will be provided in a two-stage process to minimize the risk. Initially, all licensees will be Restricted Digital Full Banks, where the individual deposits must be capped at S$75,000, and they must offer only simple credit and investment products (no derivatives or complex products). Moreover, the initial paid-up capital at the entry point is to be set at S$15 million. Following the bank’s ability to demonstrate its capability to manage risk, it will be converted into a fully functional digital bank, where the minimum paid-up capital requirement of S$1.5 billion, and there is no individual depositor cap.
Compared to Digital Full Banks, the application for digital wholesale bank licenses is open to all companies. Up to three such licenses will be given out. The MAS expects that the new digital bank licenses will “ensure that Singapore’s banking sector continues to be resilient, competitive, and vibrant.” In addition, the new digital players are expected to “provide the impetus for existing banks to continue enhancing the quality of their digital offerings.” However, the minimum paid-up capital required is set at S$100 million. Moreover, digital wholesale banks will not be able to take deposits from individuals, except for fixed deposits of at least S$250,000.
But that’s not all. For an entity to obtain any one of the five digital banking licenses, they need to demonstrate not just the ability to meet regulatory requirements. Still, they must showcase technical capability and have a sustainable business model. There is a need to highlight how they would be able to meet the objectives of deeper financial inclusion set out by MAS. Although MAS has not specified how track record of a company would play a role, profitability would likely be key in determining eligibility. Moreover, even regulatory compliance requires substantial investment in both technology and talent. There are strict reporting provisions, which may prove difficult for newer entrants/non-financial enterprise applicants. To summarise, as per MAS, the following requirements must be met for an applicant to obtain a license:
The bar is indeed set high when it comes to virtual banking space and expectations. Europe has many great examples, and Hong Kong serves as a recent and good example of this in Asia. When Hong Kong launched Virtual Banking Licenses, many big players (both tech players and banks) got the licenses. To contextualize this, 29 applied, 8 got a license.
To learn about Prove’s identity solutions and how to accelerate revenue while mitigating fraud, schedule a demo today.
Join over 1,000 businesses that rely on Prove across multiple industries, including banking, FinTech, healthcare, insurance, and e-commerce. Contact us today.
Trusted by 1,000+ leading companies to reduce fraud and improve consumer experiences. Contact us today to learn how you can frictionlessly secure your digital consumer journey — from onboarding to ongoing transactions.
Tap the button below to read our latest white-paper on the subject as industry leaders.
Contact us to learn how leading companies are using Prove Pre-Fill to modernize the account creation process by shaving off clicks and keystrokes that kill conversion.
Get in touch to find out how we can help you identify your customers at every stage of their journey and offer them seamless and secure experiences.
Let our expert team guide you through our identity verification and authentication solutions. Select a date and time that works for you.
Find out how we can help you deliver seamless and secure customer experiences that comply with PSD2/SCA. Select a date and time that works for you.
Download Aite-Novarica Group’s full report about Prove Pre-Fill, including a product overview, customer results, and how the product works.
Download the guide now to learn how you can improve security, cut down on fraud, and create the best possible customer experience.